Accelerating climate action: the role of health professionals
BMJ 2021; 375 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2425 (Published 07 October 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;375:n2425Despite years of aspirational promises from governments and leaders, we have acted too slowly on the climate emergency. Time is running out to reverse, or even halt, the damage done by humanity to our planet.
Climate change is affecting health now, and the effects will increase greatly in the future depending on the actions we take.1 Tipping points, such as ice sheet collapse or methane emissions from melting of the Arctic tundra, coral reef die offs, and alterations of oceanic currents, might be closer than we thought, leading to irreversible damage to biophysical systems with severe consequences for human wellbeing. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change indicates that, even under an intermediate greenhouse gas emissions scenario in which carbon dioxide emissions remain around current levels until 2050, the global average temperature increase is likely to be 2.1-3.5°C by the late 21st century. This emphasises the urgent need for drastic reductions in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.2
When it comes to irreversible destruction of the natural planetary systems that underpin human civilisation, there is no second chance.34
In November 2021, more than 200 countries will meet at the 26th UN climate conference (COP26), one of the largest gatherings of world leaders in history, to agree collective action on the climate emergency. The evidence is clear: setting targets is no longer enough. We need to act now, both individually and by holding organisations and governments to account. We need to recognise and communicate the harms to health of the climate emergency, create guidance on how to adapt to the change that cannot be prevented, and prevent further damage through mitigation strategies and by motivating behaviour change.
The relative importance of individual behaviour change and system change is debated. On one side, people advocate making changes, for example, to what we eat, how we travel, and how much energy we use.5 Others argue against excessive focus on behaviour, believing that even widespread behaviour change will never be enough and that a focus on individual behaviour detracts from the necessary system changes.6 This is a false dichotomy. Change is needed at both levels. Indeed, the two may be mutually reinforcing; taking individual action can energise people to work for system change.7 Young climate activists are showing everyone the way.8
Many roles of health professionals
Doctors and other health professionals are in a unique and privileged position to influence change as family members, private citizens, clinicians, researchers, advocates, and leaders.910 However, only a small proportion of health professionals feel able to take effective action in response to the climate crisis, with many citing personal and professional barriers, the most important one being a lack of time.11 Health professionals are first and foremost family members and citizens, and as individuals they can make simple climate friendly behavioural choices regarding how they live and work, what they buy, what they eat, and how they travel.
As respected community members, health professionals can introduce the climate emergency into conversations, share knowledge, and inform debate.12 Doing something tangible can give us hope and purpose, provide relief from the growing problem of climate anxiety,13 make us feel part of a collective whole, and help us square up to the challenge that we face.14 Patients can be guided to climate friendly behaviours by explaining the benefits to individual and population health.
Healthcare contributes 4-5% of global greenhouse gas emissions.15 In the NHS, 62% of these emissions are from its supply chains and 24% from delivery of care.16 Health professionals can be institutional leaders who drive decarbonisation in hospitals through reducing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in healthcare,17 eliminating waste, streamlining services,18 and better managing suppliers and procurement.19 All of these efforts will bring us closer to making healthcare more sustainable.
Many of the sustainability initiatives in the NHS were set up by health professionals before they received support from their senior managers or their organisation, with health professionals often taking the lead, identifying areas for improvement, and driving through change. Nonetheless, better education, training, and guidance on how to make clinical practice more sustainable are required, based on the best available evidence. The foundations for establishing best practice in sustainability can be laid by embedding training about the climate emergency in medical school and university curriculums.20
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2425
9 件のコメント:
柳家小三治 心不全
残念だけど草生やすかwww
> ワクチンは打った全ての反GOD派に無差別的自爆を齎す。（爆ｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗ
あ、それ知ってる！終末に666って刻印される奴やｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗ
コロの新規感染者が収まってきたお
次はインフルエンザ予防しなきゃね
そろそろこたつ出すお
>感染した反GOD派の内、要らない子のみを選別して自爆を促進する
感染＝でなくてよかったですね、サマナの皆さん
ただ自爆するまで本当に要らない子なのか不明のまま
ドキドキ心拍数で生きていくのでしょうけど
>2021年10月11日 22:20
風呂とこたつ
どちらも免疫維持に必要な体温調整機能がバグる代物ですなぁ
地球がもたん時が来ているのだ
> 本当に要らない子なのか不明のまま
そこ私も気になりw
多分GOD世界は
団長ご指摘通りに
生物学的に
淘汰を免れた
人々で今後継承
キビシー
>こたつ
は、いんじゃね？にゅーよーくと違って
コタツムリしてたら寿命銀行引出し捲りんぐだけど
>生物学的に
で済めば
しがない一般ピーは苦労しない
反GODの手羽先に振り回され死が待ち受けてる
だからてんこもりｻﾝは猫も杓子もな連日連夜ワクチン記事を出してるんだとも思う
「イギリス医師会」の提言は
＞＞過去も現在もキリスト教（反GOD派）の本質はベルゼブル（サタン）を使っているユダヤ系イカサマヒー ラー集団 そしてその布教活動の中心は教会ではなく病院と製薬会社と研究所
https://tokumei10.blogspot.com/2021/09/god.html
温暖化問題の解決のために、患者（国民）の健康管理（命の管理）を
ワクチン以上に徹底的にやるべきと のたまうているのでしょうか
コメントを投稿