BERLIN,
Feb 26 (Reuters) - Germany and its Western allies agreed to cut Russia
out of the SWIFT global payment system, a spokesperson for the German
government said on Saturday, in a third sanctions package aimed at
halting Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
The
sanctions, agreed with the United States, France, Canada, Italy, Great
Britain and the European Commission also include limiting the ability of
Russia's central bank to support the rouble.
The
will also end the "golden passports" for wealthy Russians and their
families and will target individuals and institutions in Russia and
elsewhere that supports the war against Ukraine, the spokesperson said.
"The
countries stressed their willingness to take further measures should
Russia not end its attack on Ukraine and thus on the European peace
order," he added.
Can Germany function without Vladimir Putin’s gas?
Analysis: Nord Stream 2 was meant to deliver 70% of country’s gas and switch to renewable energy has been slow
The Ukraine
crisis has plunged Germany into an intense debate about how it will
heat its homes and power its industry in future, summed up in the short
question: can Europe’s largest economy function without Vladimir Putin’s
gas?
The Green federal economics minister,
Robert Habeck, answered with a decisive “yes it can”, a day after the
chancellor, Olaf Scholz, announced the suspension of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline,
which was meant to deliver from Russia as much as 70% of Germany’s gas
requirements. There are considerable doubts as to whether the $11bn
project will ever now go ahead.
But even before Russian troops invaded Ukraine on Thursday morning, NS2 was just a small part of the wider discussion some say Germany
has been far too slow to have. At stake is nothing less than the future
of German – and by extension European – energy security.
Germany announced its withdrawal from nuclear power after the 2011 Fukushima disaster, and in 2019 said it would pull the plug on coal-fired plants,
leaving observers wondering how the country was planning to make its
energy policy workable and future-proof. Sceptics have questioned how it
made sense for Germany to make itself so dependent on Russian gas when
it should be distancing itself from Putin’s autocratic machinery. Until
recently, the answer from the top of government was that this was an
economic project, not a political one. The robotically repeated mantra
now sounds at the best naive, and at the worst, given the current turn
of events, a self-defeating decision which has helped fund Putin’s war.
Habeck
admitted “we face turbulent days ahead”, as he promised on Wednesday
that the government would provide relief where necessary to compensate
for the expected rise in gas prices. One of the government’s main
predicaments is whether it can deliver on its promise to make a switch
to renewable energy sources in order to reach its climate goal to become
carbon neutral by 2045. Gas
is seen as the vital bridge in that endeavour, which, while seen as
ambitious by international standards, is viewed by many climate experts
as barely adequate.
Importing liquified
natural gas (LNG) has been viewed as one option as part of a
diversification strategy. However, this has been beset by numerous
problems – not least the lack of a terminal in Germany necessary to
handle LNG imports. Neither would available LNG supplies be able to
fully replace Russian gas and it is also an expensive alternative. Gas
already comes from Norway, but those supplies cannot be increased as it
is already producing to capacity.
Leonhard
Birnbaum, the CEO of Germany’s biggest gas and electricity provider
E.ON, said that while energy supplies for this winter were secure, next
year could be more of a challenge. “If Russian gas imports were to break
down completely, the immediate effect wouldn’t be so dramatic as we’re
almost at the end of the heating season. But next winter it could be the
case that we’re not able to meet the supply demands of all the
industrial customers. Some of them may have to turn off the power. It is
utopian to believe that Russian gas can be completely replaced from one
day to the next by other sources,” he told Die Zeit.
Other
critics have said Germany only has itself to blame, having dillydallied
on its much vaunted plans to switch from fossil fuels to renewables. A
positive headline to emerge from the recent heavy storms which hit much
of northern Europe,
was the record amount of energy fed into the grid by its wind turbines
on Sunday. But it also served to underline how slow the development of
renewables has been.
Beyond Germany’s borders
the short-term answer is thought to be simple: why not reverse the
decisions, or at least prolong the use of coal-fired power plants and
temporarily restart the nuclear reactors?
But
these options are seen as politically suicidal in Berlin – in particular
the reactivation of nuclear plants (as well as being highly impractical
and disastrous from a legal point of view). Opposition to nuclear was
the founding principal of the Green party – two of whose former leaders,
Habeck and the foreign minister, Annalena Baerbock, are now in
government. Both have always opposed the pipeline.
There
is no evidence of ordinary Germans panicking, although heating
installation companies say there has been a considerable increase in
inquiries about heat pumps from people keen to find an alternative to
the gas central heating.
“In the short term it
won’t be easy to move away from natural gas,” Hans-Martin Henning, the
head of the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy
Systems, told Tagesspiegel. “But in the medium term this must be part
of the concept of speeding up the energy source switch in the heat
sector and wherever possible electrical heat pumps should be used as a
way of becoming more independent from natural gas.”
Andreas
Löschel, an energy economist, told the same newspaper that even before
the Ukraine crisis, Russia had destroyed its own narrative about being a
reliable provider of cheap gas. “The trust is no longer there,” he
said. “Russia has shot itself in the foot”.
Just
days ago at a press briefing with Scholz in Moscow, Putin heaped praise
on Scholz’s fellow Social Democrat Gerhard Schröder, the former German
chancellor turned lobbyist for Gazprom, saying he was responsible for
brokering generous fuel rates. It was one of Schröder’s final acts in
office in 2005 to sign the NS2 deal before he was appointed chairman of
the company behind it.
On Thursday calls were
growing for the government to remove Schröder’s privileges as a former
chancellor, including an office and staff, amid reports they cost the
taxpayer more than €400,000 (£344,244) a year, on top of his
considerable earnings from lobbying for companies including Rosneft and
Gazprom. An online petition said a “former chancellor who is financed by
autocrats, and makes himself dependent on them, in so doing ridiculing
German interests, should no longer be financed by the German taxpayer”.
Some politicians called for him to be added to the list of individuals
facing sanctions.
Writing on the LinkedIn
platform, Schröder said although “many mistakes” had “been made on both
sides” in the relationship between the west and Russia, Russia’s
“security interests did not justify its intervention by military means”.
He called on the Russian government to “end the suffering of the people
in Ukraine as soon as possible”. He also warned against “cutting the
remaining political, economic and societal connections” between Europe
and Russia.
3 件のコメント:
商売の相手を選ばないから自分の首を締めることになるんすよねwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
ましてや生活必需品をwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
SWIFTなんて
抜け穴だらけの規制持ちだして
ブーメランで涙目の人たち続出
足利銀行だって
死ななかったでしょ
北朝鮮
大丈夫です 米と中東が売ってくれますちゃんとSWIFTもすべて塞いでないといってますから安心ですよ ただ・・・ たぶんですが・・・ 言い値だと思います・・・ちゃっかり稼ぐだけです
コメントを投稿