Dutch court orders Shell Nigeria to compensate farmers
By MIKE CORDERtodayTHE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — In a victory for environmentalists and Nigerians whose land was polluted by oil leaks, a Dutch appeals court ordered energy giant Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary Friday to compensate farmers in two villages for damage to their land caused by leaks in 2004 and 2005.
Friends of the Earth Netherlands director Donald Pols hailed the ruling as a victory for small communities hurt by huge companies.
“Up until this morning, Dutch multinationals could act with impunity in developing countries ... and this has changed now,” Pols said. “From this moment onwards, Dutch multinationals will be held accountable for their activities and their actions in developing countries. And that’s an enormous victory for the rights of law globally.”
The amount of compensation paid to three farmers in the villages will be established at a later date.
The Hague Court of Appeal held Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary liable for two leaks that spewed oil over an area of a total of about 60 football pitches (soccer fields) in two villages, saying that it could not be established “beyond a reasonable doubt” that saboteurs were to blame. Under Nigerian law, which was applied in the Dutch civil case, the company is not liable if the leaks were the result of sabotage.
One of the farmers involved in the case, Eric Dooh, called the decision a victory “for the entire Niger Delta region. The victory is for the Ogoni people. Victory for all that stood by our side, both Blacks and whites.”
The Hague appeals court ruled that sabotage was to blame for an oil leak in another village; however, it said that the issue of whether Shell can be held liable “remains open” and the case will be continued as the court wants clarification about the extent of the pollution and whether it still has to be cleaned up.
The court also ruled that Dutch-based mother company Royal Dutch Shell and its Nigerian subsidiary must fit a leak-detection system to a pipeline that caused one of the spills.
The decision, which can be appealed to the Dutch Supreme Court, is the latest stage in a case that is breaking new legal ground in how far multinationals in the Netherlands can be held responsible for actions of their overseas subsidiaries.
In a written reaction, Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited expressed disappointment, saying it continued to believe that sabotage caused the spills in the villages of Oruma and Goi.
“Sabotage, crude oil theft and illegal refining are a major challenge in the Niger Delta,” the company said. “Indeed, in 2019 around 95% of spill incidents from our operations there were due to such criminal acts. Regardless of cause, we clean up and remediate, as we have done with the spills in this case.”
The Nigerian subsidiary added: “Like all Shell-operated ventures globally, we are committed to operating safely and protecting the local environment.”
In 2013, The Hague District Court ordered Shell Nigeria to compensate one of the four farmers involved in the case for making it too easy for saboteurs to open a well head that leaked onto his land. However, the court cleared Shell of blame in pollution of the other three farmers’ land and ruled that Shell’s Dutch parent company could not be held liable.
Both sides appealed, and judges ruled in 2015 that Shell could be held to account in Dutch courts for its actions in Nigeria. The judges also ordered Shell to give the plaintiffs access to documents that could shed more light on the cause of the leaks and how much Shell management knew about them.
Shell discovered and started exploiting Nigeria’s vast oil reserves in the late 1950s and has faced heavy criticism from activists and local communities over spills and for the company’s close ties to government security forces.
Friends of the Earth lawyers told the court that that leaking pipes are caused by poor maintenance and inadequate security and that Shell does not do enough to clean up spills.
“Tears of joy here. After 13 years, we’ve won,” the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth tweeted immediately after the decision was read out in court.
https://apnews.com/article/business-netherlands-nigeria-the-hague-pollution-df365847d4cf6bf2a1fcd1b94d1cbf2e
... to come from the family's longstanding stake in the Royal Dutch/Shell Group. At one time, the Oranges reportedly owned as much as 25% of the oil company; ...
10 件のコメント:
Orangeっちゅうたら
汚腐蘭枢テレコムじゃ
ないですかwwww
こんなんじゃ自由貿易も無理よね
いい感じで荒れてますな
WTOトップ、早期選出求める声
非公式閣僚会合で意見相次ぐ
【ジュネーブ共同】世界貿易機関(WTO)の非公式閣僚会合が29日、オンライン形式で開かれ、不在が続く事務局長の早期選出を求める声が参加した29カ国・地域から相次いだ。日本政府や会合を主催したスイス政府が明らかにした。
WTOは昨年10月、日本や中国、欧州連合(EU)などの支持を得たナイジェリアのオコンジョイウェアラ元財務相を推薦。だが米国のトランプ前政権が反対し、対抗馬の韓国産業通商資源省の兪明希通商交渉本部長も撤退の意向を示しておらず、膠着状態が続いている。
29日の会合に韓国からは兪氏本人が出席したが、どのような発言があったかは明らかにされていない。
シェル、中国海洋石油と戦略提携 石油開発など技術・資金協力
https://r.nikkei.com/article/DGXNASGM1800D_Y4A610C1EAF000
中国海洋石油を中国人民解放軍関連企業に指定
https://business.nikkei.com/atcl/global/19/newyork/120401373/
オレンジ利権没収
違うかな
>Orangeっちゅうたら
>汚腐蘭枢テレコムじゃ
>ないですかwwww
>2021年1月30日 9:00
China Telecom and Orange Business Services Extend Strategic Partnership to Provide Seamless IoT Experience for Enterprises
https://www.orange-business.com/en/press/china-telecom-and-orange-business-services-extend-strategic-partnership-to-provide-seamless
中国電信含む中国人民解放軍関連企業に投資禁止
https://www.jiji.com/sp/article?k=2021011100321&g=int
こうですか?わかりません
外国人の知り合いは居ないけども
アメリカ人が最もマシな西洋人らしいことはわかった
「こういう結論にする」という所から物事をスタートさせてるから東京方面と争わせようとしても、無能に仕立て上げようとしても(有能ではないけど)、モルモットさんにはあんまり通じない
むしろ長い期間になってるのにマンネリパターンばかりするからターゲットのモルモットさんは毎日が作業的になってますよ
精神的ダメージ皆無
本人しかわからないはずのことをみんな知ってるということは、ターゲットの人間が「そうなる」ように持っていくことも出来る
なので、私の評価は「ノーカウント。訳わかんね」にしかならないでしょうね
ある人間をヒーローにするのも犯罪者にするのも演出次第
Orange signe un partenariat avec China Telecom
https://jp.reuters.com/article/orange-china-telecom-idFRL5E7LC2FJ20111012
中国人民解放軍にケツの穴掘られるのに年季が入っている
BBC News
Royal Dutch Shell sees huge loss as pandemic hits oil demand
Oil giant Royal Dutch Shell sank to a net loss of $21.7bn (£16bn) last year after the coronavirus pandemic caused demand to slump.
3 days ago
コメントを投稿