But the harsh truth is that for all the generosity, for all the good intentions, those heartfelt efforts ended up unwittingly doing more harm than good in Ethiopia.
Dec 8, 2022 — Ebola disease caused by Sudan ebolavirus – Uganda ... Since the last Disease Outbreak News published on 24 November, one new confirmed case of ...
Jan 14, 2023 — Uganda declared an outbreak of Ebola disease caused by Sudan ebolavirus on 20 September 2022, after a case at Mubende Regional Referral Hospital ...
英語WIKIはあるのに日本語WIKIが無いスーダンエボラウイルス・・・
The speciesSudan ebolavirus is a virological taxon included in the genusEbolavirus, familyFiloviridae, orderMononegavirales. The species has a single virus member, Sudan virus (SUDV).[1] The members of the species are called Sudan ebolaviruses.[1] It was discovered in 1977 and causes Ebola clinically indistinguishable from the ebola Zaire strain, but is less transmissible than it. Unlike with ebola Zaire there is no vaccine available.
Nomenclature
The name Sudan ebolavirus is derived from Sudan (the country in which Sudan virus was first discovered) and the taxonomicsuffixebolavirus (which denotes an ebolavirus species).[1]
The species was introduced in 1998 as Sudan Ebola virus.[2][3] In 2002, the name was changed to Sudan ebolavirus.[4][5]
A virus of the genus Ebolavirus is a member of the species Sudan ebolavirus if:[1]
The first known outbreak of EVD occurred due to Sudan virus in South Sudan between June and November 1976, infecting 284 people and killing 151, with the first identifiable case on 27 June 1976.[6][7][8]
Sudan virus was first introduced as a new "strain" of Ebola virus in 1977.[9] Sudan virus was described as "Ebola haemorrhagic fever" in a 1978 WHO report describing the 1976 Sudan outbreak.[11] In 2000, it received the designation Sudan Ebola virus[12][13] and in 2002 the name was changed to Sudan ebolavirus.[4][5] Previous abbreviations for the virus were EBOV-S (for Ebola virus Sudan) and most recently SEBOV (for Sudan Ebola virus or Sudan ebolavirus). The virus received its final designation in 2010, when it was renamed Sudan virus (SUDV).[1]
Virus inclusion criteria
A virus of the species Sudan ebolavirus is a Sudan virus (SUDV) if it has the properties of Sudan ebolaviruses and if its genome diverges from that of the prototype Sudan virus, Sudan virus variant Boniface (SUDV/Bon), by ≤10% at the nucleotide level.[1]
SUDV is one of four ebolaviruses that causes Ebola virus disease (EVD) in humans (in the literature also often referred to as Ebola hemorrhagic fever, EHF). EVD due to SUDV infection cannot be differentiated from EVD caused by other ebolaviruses by clinical observation alone, which is why the clinical presentation and pathology of infections by all ebolaviruses is presented together on a separate page. The strain is less transmissible than Zaire ebolavirus.[14]
As of 2022, there are six experimental vaccines but only three have advanced to the stage where human clinical trials have begun.[18]
As the Public Health Agency of Canada developed a candidate RVSV vaccine for Sudan ebolavirus. Merck was developing it, but as of 18 October 2022 had discontinued development; Merck's monopolies on rVSV techniques, acquired with funding from GAVI, are not available to others developing rVSV vaccines.[19]
As of 2021 GeoVax was developing MVA-SUDV-VLP, which is a modified vaccinia Ankara virus producing Sudan virus-like particles; early data from their research showed the GeoVax vaccine candidate to be 100% effective at preventing death from the Sudan ebolavirus in animals.[20]
The ecology of SUDV is currently unclear and no reservoir host has yet been identified. Therefore, it remains unclear how SUDV was repeatedly introduced into human populations. As of 2009, bats have been suspected to harbor the virus because infectious Marburg virus (MARV), a distantly related filovirus, has been isolated from bats,[21] and because traces (but no infectious particles) of the more closely related Ebola virus (EBOV) were found in bats as well.[22]
Molecular biology
SUDV is basically uncharacterized on a molecular level. However, its genomic sequence, and with it the genomic organization and the conservation of individual open reading frames, is similar to that of the other four known ebolaviruses. It is therefore currently assumed that the knowledge obtained for EBOV can be extrapolated to SUDV and that all SUDV proteins behave analogous to those of EBOV.[citation needed]
7 件のコメント:
>フランス大使館員の車列に攻撃、1人けが
まあ攻撃対象としては当然
ほんにw
>スーダンから在留邦人の一部が退避
そもそもスーダンなんぞで何してはったんですか？
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww何してたか言えないなら
治安ってナニ？地帯に
邦人の何の属性がいがちなのかだけでも言質でいいから知りたいかも
危機のタイプZ型→ウクライナ
危機のタイプS型→エチオピア
Zは地面とか石という意味でしたっけ
ＳはＳＳとかナチスを連想しますが、果たしてどういう意味なのか？
ウクライナのナチスはZが全部片付けるのかな
>ヨーロッパにとっては、スーダンは不法難民の移動の中継点なので、そのスーダンが崩れると国境警部機能も低下するということになります。数年前に、ヨーロッパに大量の難民が押し寄せた事態があります
今度はエボラがヨーロッパに蔓延か（ワクチンないので、また、別のウィルスばら撒く必要あるのか……）
終わりの始まりの終わり？
スーダン在留邦人 仏空軍により周辺国に退避 | NHK | スーダン
命からがらでﾜﾛｽw
汚腐乱とつるんで何やってたんですかねw
内乱沙汰はスーダンへの
大規模火力消毒だったのかー
避難在留日本人に研究者いるかなー
Ｚ型 yellow
Ｓ型 green
コメントを投稿