SKY News Australia のファウチのドキュメンタリー放映直前にランセット紙が武漢漏洩説の否定を実質的に撤回

2021年9月20日月曜日

SKY News Australia 明日放映 COVID-19の出所が確定 ファウチにD-Flag　トランプやポンペオも登場https://tokumei10.blogspot.com/2021/09/sky-news-australia-covid-19-d-flag.html

2021年9月12日日曜日

武漢研究所流出説を必死で否定したランセットの２７人の内２６人の反GOD派サマナの皆様に武漢研究所との利害関係

https://tokumei10.blogspot.com/2021/09/god_12.html

Now the Lancet U-turns over Covid lab leak theory and publishes 'alternative view' calling for a 'transparent debate' on the origins of the virus

• Peter Daszak secretly orchestrated a landmark statement in The Lancet this year
• It attacked 'conspiracies suggesting that Covid-19 does not have a natural origin'
• Now The Lancet agreed to publish alternative theories suggesting a lab origin 

By Glen Owen and Stephen Adams for The Mail on Sunday

Published: 19:58 EDT, 18 September 2021 | Updated: 03:24 EDT, 19 September 2021

 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10005295/Now-Lancet-U-turns-Covid-lab-leak-theory.html 

 The Lancet medical journal has bowed to pressure over its heavily-criticised coverage of the disputed origins of the Covid pandemic by publishing an 'alternative view' from 16 scientists – calling for an 'objective, open and transparent debate' about whether the virus leaked from a Chinese laboratory.

It was revealed earlier this year that Peter Daszak – a British scientist with long-standing links to the Wuhan Institute of Virology – had secretly orchestrated a landmark statement in The Lancet in February 2020 which attacked 'conspiracy theories suggesting that Covid-19 does not have a natural origin'.

The now-infamous letter, signed by 27 leading public health experts, said they stood together to 'strongly condemn' the theories which they said 'do nothing but create fear, rumours, and prejudice'.

They also lavished praise on Chinese scientists who they said had 'worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak… and share their results transparently with the global health community'.

Now, The Lancet has agreed to publish an alternative commentary which discusses the possibility that laboratory research might have played a role in the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

It also directly confronts the efforts of science journals to stifle debate by labelling such theories as 'misinformation'.

In the article, the authors argue that 'there is no direct support for the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, and a laboratory-related accident is plausible'. 

They add that the February 2020 statement 'imparted a silencing effect on the wider scientific debate'.

And they say scientists, 'need to evaluate all hypotheses on a rational basis, and to weigh their likelihood based on facts and evidence, devoid of speculation concerning possible political impacts'.

 要するにランセット関係の26人の研究者の面々のGuilty判決確定ですな。（爆ｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗ