Dunn thinks a big reason for the unprecedented protection has to do with the expedited timeline.
“When
the government said, ‘We want you to develop this four or five times
faster than you normally do,’ most likely the manufacturers said to the
government, ‘We want you, the government, to protect us from
multimillion-dollar lawsuits,’” said Dunn.
The quickest vaccine ever developed was for mumps. It took four years and was licensed in 1967. Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine was developed and cleared for emergency use in eight months — a fact that has fueled public mistrust of the coronavirus inoculation in the U.S.
Roughly 4 in 10 Americans say they would “definitely” or “probably” not get vaccinated, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. While this is lower than it was two months ago, it still points to a huge trust gap.
But
drugmakers like Pfizer continue to reassure the public no shortcuts
were taken. “This is a vaccine that was developed without cutting
corners,” CEO Dr. Albert Bourla said in an interview
with CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Monday. “This is a vaccine that is getting
approved by all authorities in the world. That should say something.”
The
legal immunity granted to pharmaceutical companies doesn’t just guard
them against lawsuits. Dunn said it helps lower the cost of the
immunizations.
“The government doesn’t want people suing the
companies making the Covid vaccine. Because then, the manufacturers
would probably charge the government a higher price per person per
dose,” Dunn explained.
Pfizer and Moderna did not return CNBC’s request for comment on their legal protections.
Remember, vaccine manufacturers aren’t the ones approving their product for mass distribution. That is the job of the FDA.
Which begs the question, can you sue the U.S. government if you have an extraordinarily bad reaction to a vaccine?
Again, the answer is no.
“You
can’t sue the FDA for approving or disapproving a drug,” said Dorit
Reiss, a professor at the University of California Hastings College of
Law. “That’s part of its sovereign immunity.”
Sovereign immunity
came from the king, explains Dunn, referring to British law before the
American Revolution. “You couldn’t sue the king. So, America has
sovereign immunity, and even each state has sovereign immunity.”
There
are limited exceptions, but Dunn said he doesn’t think they provide a
viable legal path to hold the federal government responsible for a Covid vaccine injury.
Bringing
workers back to the office in a post-Covid world also carries with it a
heightened fear of liability for employers. Lawyers across the country
say their corporate clients are reaching out to them to ask whether they
can require employees to get immunized.
Dunn’s clients who run businesses serving
customers in person or on site are most interested in mandating a Covid
vaccine for staff.
“They view it as a selling point,” Dunn said.
“It’s particularly important for restaurants, bars, gyms and salons. My
clients in that segment of the service industry are looking hard at
making it mandatory, as a sales point to their customers.”
While this is in part a public relations tactic, it is legally within an employer’s rights to impose such a requirement.
“Requiring a vaccine is a health and safety work rule, and employers can do that,” said Reiss.
There
are a few notable exceptions. If a work force is unionized, the
collective bargaining agreement may require negotiating with the union
before mandating a vaccine.
Anti-discrimination laws provide some
protections as well. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, workers
who don’t want to be vaccinated for medical reasons are eligible to
request an exemption. If taking the vaccine is a violation of a
“sincerely held” religious belief, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 would potentially provide a way to opt out.
Should
none of these exemptions apply, employees may have some legal recourse
if they suffer debilitating side effects following a work-mandated Covid
inoculation.
Attorneys say claims would most likely be routed through worker’s compensation programs and treated as an on-the-job injury.
“But
there are significant limits or caps on the damages an employee can
recover,” said Dunn. He added that it would likely be difficult to
prove.
Mandatory vaccination protocols, however, may not happen until the FDA formally approves the vaccines and grants Pfizer and BioNTech or Moderna a license to sell them, which will take several more months of data to show their safety and effectiveness.
“An
emergency use authorization is not a license,” said Reiss. “There’s a
legal question as to whether you can mandate an emergency observation.
The language in the act is somewhat unclear on that.”
$50,000 a year
The government has created a way for people to recover some damages should something go wrong following immunization.
In addition to the legal immunity, the PREP Act established the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which provides benefits to eligible individuals who suffer serious injury from one of the protected companies.
The little-known government program has been around for a decade, and it is managed by an agency under HHS. This fund typically only deals with vaccines you probably would never get, like the H1N1 and anthrax vaccines.
If a case for compensation through the CICP is successful, the program provides up to $50,000 per year
in unreimbursed lost wages and out-of-pocket medical expenses. It won’t
cover legal fees or anything to compensate for pain and suffering.
It
is also capped at the death benefit of $370,376, which is the most a
surviving family member receives in the event that a Covid vaccine
proves to be fatal.
But experts specializing in vaccine law say it
is difficult to navigate. “This government compensation program is very
hard to use,” said Reiss. “The bar for compensation is very high.”
Also
worrisome to some vaccine injury lawyers is the fact that the CICP has
rejected a majority of the compensation requests made since the program
began 10 years ago. Of the 499 claims filed, the CICP has compensated only 29 claims, totaling more than $6 million.
David Carney, vice president of the Vaccine Bar
Association, said the CICP might deny a claim for a variety of reasons.
“One reason might be that the medical records don’t support a claim,”
said Carney, who regularly deals with vaccine injury cases. “We have to
litigate a lot of really complex issues ... and provide a medical basis
for why the injury occurred.”
Proving an injury was a direct
result of the Covid vaccine could be difficult, according to Carney.
“It’s not as simple as saying. ‘Hey, I got a Covid treatment, and now I
have an injury.’ There is a lot of burden of proof there.”
There is also a strict one-year statute, meaning that all claims have to be filed within 12 months of receiving the vaccine.
“People
who are harmed by a Covid vaccine deserve to be compensated fast and
generously,” said Reiss. “The PREP Act doesn’t do that.”
Lawyers
tell CNBC that it would make more sense for Covid vaccine injuries to
instead be routed through another program under the HHS called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which handles claims for 16 routine vaccines. Known colloquially as “vaccine court,” the program paid on about 70% of petitions adjudicated by the court from 2006 to 2018.
And since it began considering claims in 1988, the VICP has paid approximately $4.4 billion in total compensation. That dwarfs the CICP’s roughly $6 million in paid benefits over the life of the program.
The VICP also gives you more time to file your claim. You have three years from the date of the first symptom to file for compensation.
“The
VICP allows for recovery of pain and suffering, attorney’s fees, along
with medical expenses and lost wages, if any,” said Michael Maxwell, a
lawyer who practices in the areas of business litigation and personal
injury. “Under the CICP, it’s only lost wages and out-of-pocket medical
expenses. That’s it, unless there’s a death.”
The Covid-19 vaccines, however, aren’t on the list of eligible vaccines.
Reiss
said the best fix would be to change VICP’s rulebook to add Covid
vaccines to its list of covered inoculations. “That will require
legislative change. I hope that legislative change happens.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
3 件のコメント:
殺虫剤も段々強くなっててもGがすぐ死なないね
そりゃ売抜けもしますよね。免疫切れるかヤバい状況になるまでヒャッハーしてあとは店畳めばいいじゃんこれ。
>>「それは主権免除の一部です。
主権免除は王から来た、とダンは、アメリカ革命の前に英国の法律に言及して説明します。「あなたは王を訴えることができませんでした。ですから、アメリカには主権免除があり、各国家にも主権免除があります。
現在の民主主義国家の「王」は、企業なんです。
コメントを投稿