疑惑のホワイトヘルメッツ＠シリアにJICAからのカネ

シリア毒ガス攻撃は白ヘルメット隊による捏造？ via kwout

2017 Committee on the National Security Strategy inquiry

The Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy launched an inquiry examining the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund in May 2016.^[16][17] On 2 November 2016 Lord McConnell criticised the fact there was no up-to-date public strategy for the fund, as the 2011 Building Stability Overseas Strategy has never been updated.^[3] In November 2016 the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy inquiry asked Sir Mark Lyall Grant, the Prime Minister’s National Security Adviser, to disclose details of the fund’s spending.^[18] This followed concern in the media that the fund was causing more of the UK aid budget to be spent on defence and foreign policy objectives.^[19][20][21]
The inquiry issued its report on 6 February 2017. The government had refused to disclose which countries were receiving money under the CSSF, and only a small number of individual projects were disclosed. The government stated that some projects must remain secret for security reasons. The committee reported that the fund had opaque objectives and achievements, and lacked accountability. The committee reported that "There is a risk that the CSSF is being used as a ‘slush fund’ for projects that may be worthy, but which do not collectively meet the needs of UK national security". There was particular criticism of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, both for its lack of procurement expertise and outdated understanding of the political causes of armed conflict. The committee concluded it could not "provide parliamentary accountability for taxpayers’ money spent via the CSSF." It recommended a single Cabinet Office minister should be responsible for the fund's spending.^[22][23][24]
In 2017 the Independent Commission for Aid Impact started a review of the CSSF, with the final report due in Spring 2018.^[25]


、、、（爆ｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗ